Life and Death?

Death is not a subject most people want to talk about – surely there is something clickable about baby orangutans or funny garden hose accidents or a bird to watch, instead. No problem – keep away from the topic, it’s not going as if you are ever going know the experience of death.

The great thinkers of the world, though, alive or dead, have dipped their gnarled toes into this subject, and yet it remains distinctly unclear for most of us still upright here on earth. We need help on this subject, those humans capable of entertaining Big Thoughts without losing their minds. No qualifications are really necessary, though there should be a general level of informed concern about Life/Death matters.

Death seems the easier part – upon the cessation of electrical activity in the brain, the person is dead, a dead parrot. No more firing/wiring between the neurons, and consciousness is gone, and process of bodily decay begins. Nothing has ever been recorded that suggests any process or dimension above or beyond this stark and observable reality of human death – no “afterlife,” no “spirit,” no other human invention that supersedes the finality of death. Fine, that’s it, all that know through our consciousness, including the sense of our selves, stops, goodbye to all that, let new forms of human life inherit that same capability. All right, death is simple and understandable, case concluded  – but what about “Life”?

How are we to say we are “alive” and not “dead”? As individuals, we possess a cognitive apparatus that sustains the illusion that there is a solitary self, a unique irreducible identity that is the “us” we encounter every single waking moment. However, this illusion of consciousness is a product of neurons firing/wiring this shimmering “knowledge” back and forth, a constant, rational assumption that we are that one man or woman, integrated and whole as one human being, with memories, propensities, universal standing. Yet, again, these are just neurons doing their business, across the dendrites, speeding around the neofrontal cortex, subject to great and abiding subconscious impulses and inhibitions.

Is that, then “Life”? This curious molecular arrangement, shaped by the unreachable forces of natural selection, happens to every man or woman, and then stops, fatally out of fuel. Is there a purpose, an acme  level of meaning, a grand overarching  measurement of the worth to this common, ungovernable, basic exchange of electrical energy between unobserved molecules?

Don’t look to the Big Thinkers for much guidance on this – too much philosophical or scientific grandiloquence from others’ agglomereated neuronal clusters obscures the fundamental, atavistic nature of the concepts of life/death. What can we boil this down to – just keep stepping with the multiple illusions, don’t think too hard, go back to the comforting anti-intellectualism of everyday time-wasting?

Sure, why not. There’s only so much dissonance a neuronal system can sustain before it overheats. Back to “me”?

3 Comments

  1. I take it you are a hard solipsist. I agree with that. We can only know what we know. There isn’t any way to say we aren’t a brain in a jar having experiences pumped in and be stimulated in just the right way. As this is my senses are all I have to go by I live as though the reality I experience is shared throughout the universe.

    I haven’t heard about social nihilism before. Could you give me a reader’s digest version of what it is. Google wasn’t much help 🙂

    1. Thanks for your comments and interest – social nihilism must be catching on precisely nowhere if Google can’t help, but it is a nihilism that still gets up in the morning and works to knock aside the predicaments of living in a badly corrupted supersystem.
      Social nihilism is the attempt to live with sanity in an insane world – to see that climate change, economic inequality, unproductive work, rampant depression, and other the other extremely related ills of contemporary living will never be overcome by the forces of truth, justice, and the global way, but who really cares, life has always been a fraught enterprise.
      “Hard solipsism” – is there a test for that? Shouldn’t we distrust our own individual certainties at some level, but still try to keep up the project of living without our brains exploding from within?

      1. Thanks for the info! I did find a few things on google but nothing with a quick definition and as I was on mobile and putting kiddos to bed I didn’t have as much time to invest in research as I would have liked 🙂

        I don’t think there is a test for solipsism mainly because if it were false then we’d be where we are but if it were true there would be no way to test the external environment for it as all of our experiences would be in that brain in a vat so to speak. Not really a position but more a philosophical/metaphysical idea.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s